EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PROPOLIS ON SOME PRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF AWASSI EWES

Authors

  • H. N. Abood Department of Animal Production, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • H. K. Al-Waith Department of Animal Production, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • S. M. Al-Jubori Department of Animal Production, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/bqzmj724

Keywords:

: milk components,, milk production,, propolis,, sheep

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of different levels of propolis on the productive traits of Awassi ewes. Twenty-five ewes with similar weights and ages were used and divided into five groups, with five ewes per treatment. Propolis was administered to the ewes daily for a month premating and a month before the expected birth. The groups included: Control group without adding propolis; 5, 10,15 & 20 g of propolis/ewe/day Dosed to T1, T2, T3 & T4 were closed respectively. The experiment continued until the end of lactation season for these ewes. The T3 treatment exhibited higher (P≤0.01) ewe's weight at mating than other groups, greater (P≤0.05) weight at pregnancy than T1 and T4 treatments, and higher (P≤0.05) weight was observed at birth than the T1 and T2 treatments was observed. The T3 and T4 were significantly superior (P≤0.05) in the daily milk yield (DMY) over the control for the 1st  and 2nd productive months. Moreover, T3 exhibited higher (P≤0.05) DMY than T4 and the control in the 3rd productive month. Higher (P≤0.05) milk fat percentage was noticed for T4 than other groups and in the 2nd productive month, whereas T4 was higher (P≤0.01) than with other groups in the percentage of lactose for the 2nd productive month. Higher (P≤0.01) milk protein percentage was observed in T4 treatment over thanT2, T1, and C groups. In conclusion, different levels of propolis affected positively the production performance of Awassi ewes.

Received: 15/12/2024

Accepted: 12/3/2025

Published: 30/6/2026

References

Abu-Seida, A. M. (2023). Potential benefits of propolis in large and small animal practices: A narrative review of the literature. World's Veterinary Journal, 13(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj48

Aguiar, S. C., Paula, E. M., Yoshimura, E. H., Rosa dos Santos, W. B., Machado, E., Valero, M. V., dos Santos, G. T., & Zeoula, L. M. (2014). Effects of phenolic compounds in propolis on digestive and ruminal parameters in dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 43(4), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000400006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000400006

Ahmad, S. I., Malak, H. A., & Abulreesh, H. H. (2021). Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: A potential threat to public health. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 27, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001

Almuhayawi, M. S. (2020). Propolis as a novel antibacterial agent. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(11), 3079–3086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.016

Al-Sheikhly, M. A., Adul Jalil, F. H., & Al-Azawi, H. F. (1993). Practical Biochemistry. College of Science, Al-Mustansiriya University. https://doi.org/10.23851/mjs.v35i4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23851/mjs.v35i4

Badway, H. S. (2021). Effect of propolis as a feed additive on nutritional and productive performance of pregnant ewes and their lambs under Halaib-Shalateen pastures condition. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, Mansoura University, 12(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.21608/jappmu.2021.149445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jappmu.2021.149445

Boudalia, S., Smeti, S., Dawit, M., Senbeta, E. K., Gueroui, Y., Dotas, V., Bousbia, A., & Symeon, G. K. (2024). Alternative approaches to feeding small ruminants and their potential benefits. Animals, 14(6), Article 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14060904

Cécere, B. G. O., Silva, A. S., Molosse, V. L., Alba, D. F., Leal, K. W., Rosa, G., Pereira, W. A. B., Silva, A. D., Schetinger, M. R. C., Kempla, A. P., Nunes, A., Maraschim, M., Araújo, D. N., Deolindo, G. L., & Vedovatto, M. (2021). Addition of propolis to milk improves lactating lamb’s growth: Effect on antimicrobial, antioxidant and immune responses in animals. Small Ruminant Research, 194, Article 106265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106265

Da Silva, R. O., Andrade, V. M., Rêgo, E. S. B., Dória, G. A. A., Lima, B. S., da Silva, F. A., Araújo, A. A. S., Júnior, R. L. C. A., Cardoso, J. C., & Gomes, M. Z. (2015). Acute and sub-acute oral toxicity of Brazilian red propolis in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 170, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.009

da Silva, Y. A., de Almeida, V. V. S., & Oliveira, A. C. (2021). Can roughage: concentrate ratio affect the action of red propolis extract on sheep metabolism. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, Article 472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02907-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02907-9

Daley, D. K., & Badal, S. (2024). Plant crude drugs. In S. Badal & R. Delgoda (Eds.), Pharmacognosy (2nd ed., pp. 75–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18657-8.00002-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18657-8.00002-5

Dantas, M. R. T., Palhano, I. J. F., Castelo, T. D., Souza-Junior, B. F., Júnior, D. M. D., & Costa, M. L. D. (2023). Using propolis as heat stress attenuates agent in ruminants: An overall review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6, 202–302. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023002

De Sousa, M. A. P., Esteves, S. N., Chaves, L. C., Gallo, S. B., Pereira, V. S., da Fonseca, J. F., Silva, A. G., & Garcia, A. R. (2023). Overnutrition of ewe in late gestation and the impact on placental efficiency and lamb’s performance. Animals, 13(1), Article 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010103

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Haslin, E., Allington, T., Blumer, S. E., Boshoff, J., Clarke, B. E., Hancock, S. N., Kearney, G. A., Kenyon, R. P., Krog, J., Kubeil, L. J., Lockwood, A., Refshauge, G., Trompf, J. P., & Thompson, A. N. (2023). Management of body condition score between pregnancy scanning and lamb marking impacts the survival of triplet-bearing ewes and their lambs. Animals, 13(13), Article 2057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132057

Kumar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2015). Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: A review of literature. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 8(4), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.170370

Lange, O., Proczko-Stepaniak, M., & Mika, A. (2023). Short-chain fatty acids a product of the microbiome and its participation in two-way communication on the microbiome-host mammal line. Current Obesity Reports, 12(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00503-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00503-6

Leite, J. H., Façanha, D. A. E., Bermejo, J. V. D., Guilhermino, M. M., & Bermejo, L. A. (2021). Adaptive assessment of small ruminants in arid and semi-arid regions. Small Ruminant Research, 203, Article 106497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106497

Lopez, V., Jager, A. K., Akerreta, S., Cavero, P. Y., & Calvo, M. I. (2011). Pharmacological properties of Anagallis arvensis L. (“scarlet pimpernel”) and Anagallis foemina Mill. (“blue pimpernel”) traditionally used as wound healing remedies in Navarra (Spain). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 134(3), 1014–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.12.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.12.036

Majtan, J. (2019). Antibacterial properties of propolis. Molecules, 24(11), Article 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112047

Malyugina, S., & Horky, P. (2024). The effect of humic acid supplementation on selected ruminal fermentation parameters and protozoal generic distribution in cows. Agriculture, 14(10), Article 1663. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101663

Manyi-Loh, C., Mamphweli, S., Meyer, E., & Okoh, A. (2018). Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: Potential public health implications. Molecules, 23(4), Article 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040795

Mizzi, L., Chatzitzika, C., & Valdramidis, V. (2020). HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds and flavonoids with overlapping peaks. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 58(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.58.01.20.6395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.58.01.20.6395

Morsy, A. S., Soltan, Y. A., Sallam, S. M., Kreuzer, A. M., Alencar, S. M., & Abdalla, A. L. (2015). Comparison of the in vitro efficiency of supplementary bee propolis extracts of different origin in enhancing the ruminal degradability of organic matter and mitigating the formation of methane. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 199(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.004

Oršolić, N., & Jembrek, M. J. (2022). Molecular and cellular mechanisms of propolis and its polyphenolic compounds against cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(18), Article 10479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810479

Paixão, T. R., Almeida, V. V. S., Oliveira, A. C., Silva, A. P. G., Silva, J. W. D., Santos, L. V., Lima Júnior, D. M., & Silva, R. R. (2022). Intake, digestibility, ruminal parameters, and performance in lamb fed with increasing levels of red propolis extract. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54, Article 364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03376-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03376-4

Pasupuleti, V. R., Sammugam, L., Ramesh, N., & Gan, S. H. (2017). Honey, propolis, and royal jelly: A comprehensive review of their biological actions and health benefits. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2017, Article 1259510. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1259510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1259510

Ponnampalam, E. N., Kiani, A., Santhiravel, S., Holman, B. W., Lauridsen, C., & Dunshea, F. R. (2022). The importance of dietary antioxidants on oxidative stress, meat and milk production, and their preservative aspects in farm animals: Antioxidant action, animal health, and product quality—Invited review. Animals, 12(23), Article 3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233279

Sardinha, L. A., Marques, R. S., Miszura, A. A., Oliveira, G. B., & Polizel, D. M. (2020). Milk yield and composition from ewes fed diets containing narasin and their lambs’ performance. Translational Animal Science, 4(2), Article txaa030. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa030

SAS Institute. (2018). SAS User's Guide (Version 9.6). SAS Institute Inc.

Seal, T., & Chaudhuri, K. (2017). High performance liquid chromatography method for the estimation of water-soluble vitamin in five wild edible fruits consumed by the tribal people of north-Eastern region in India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(10), 2900–2913. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.343

Senkal, R. H., Al-Waith, H. K., Al-Anbari, N. N., & Al-Samarai, W. I. (2023). Genetic analysis of milk production and lactation period in Holstein cows according to BTN1A1 gene polymorphism. Bionatura, 8(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2023.08.02.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2023.08.02.26

Soltan, T. A., & Patra, A. K. (2020). Bee propolis as a natural feed additive: Bioactive compounds and effects on ruminal fermentation pattern as well as productivity of ruminants. Indian Journal of Animal Health, 59(2-Special Issue), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.36062/ijah.59.2SPL.2020.50-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36062/ijah.59.2SPL.2020.50-61

Soltan, Y. A., Morsy, A. S., Sallam, S. M. A., & Abdalla, A. L. (2016). Propolis as natural feed additive in ruminant diets; can propolis affect the ruminant’s performance? A review. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 19(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2016.74870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejnf.2016.74870

Ungerfeld, E. M. (2020). Metabolic hydrogen flows in rumen fermentation: Principles and possibilities of interventions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article 589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00589

Varela, A. M. G., de Lima Júnior, D. M., De Alves, F. G., & de Oliveira Lima, P. (2023). The effect of propolis extract on milk production and composition, serum biochemistry, and physiological parameters of heat-stressed dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55(4), Article 244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03647-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03647-8

Woźniak, M., Sip, A., Mrówczyńska, L., Broniarczyk, J., Waśkiewicz, A., & Ratajczak, I. (2023). Biological activity and chemical composition of propolis from various regions of Poland. Molecules, 28(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010141

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Vol. 57 No. 6 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 H. N. Abood, H. K. Al-Waith , S. M. Al-Jubori

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

H. N. Abood, H. N. A., H. K. Al-Waith , H. K. A.-W., & S. M. Al-Jubori, S. M. A.-J. (2026). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PROPOLIS ON SOME PRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF AWASSI EWES . IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 57(6), 1819-1828. https://doi.org/10.36103/bqzmj724