ESTIMATION OF GENETIC PARAMETERS AND BREEDING VALUE OF SEXUAL AND EGG PRODUCTION TRAITS IN IRAQI LOCAL CHICKENS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36103/65fkcr44Keywords:
genetic parameters, local chickens, egg production, sexual maturity traits.Abstract
This study was conducted to estimate (Co) variance components of a sexual and egg production traits in Iraqi brown local chickens. Data on 2234 pedigreed hens for successive six generations of selection for high egg production during the first 24 weeks of laying were used. Data of first egg weight (FEWT), body weight at sexual maturity (BWSM), age at sexual maturity (ASM), egg number (EN), egg weight (EW) and egg mass (EM) were recorded individually. The univariate and bivariate animal models under Average Information Restricted Maximum Likelihood (AI-REML) were applied to estimate the variance component and the BLUP breeding values. The average of the traits mentioned above was 35.7g, 1489.59g, 149.31d, 109.32 egg/hen, 44.80g and 4887.72g respectively. Heritability estimates based on individual animal model was 0.17, 0.42, 0.39, 0.40, 0.68 and 0.40 for the traits mentioned above respectively. The genetic and phenotypic correlations between sexual traits (ASM, BWSM, and FEWT) showed moderate and positive values. Genetic correlation between sexual traits (ASM, BWSM, and FEWT) with EN and EM was negative. Genetic correlations between (EN and EW), (EN and EM) and (EW and EM) were -0.105,0.902 and 0.337 respectively. Genetic correlations between ASM with EW were negative while BWSM and FEWT with EW were Positive. Average breeding values across generation tend to be positive in productive traits but it was negative in sexual traits. In conclusion, a good performance and reliable estimation of genetic parameters and BLUP breeding value shown in the current study could be revealed that Iraqi brown local chickens have a good genetic potential for egg production traits and respond well to selection for increasing egg production traits.
References
1. Abu-Rekaiba, R.I.A.,W.M. Razuki and E.H. Al-Anbari. 2021. Polimorphic Explore of Esr1, Esr2 and Foxl2 Genes and Interaction Effect of Esri and Foxl2 with Productive Traits of Brown Local Iraqi Chickens. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 910 (1): 012004. https://doi:10.1088/1755-1315/910/1/012004
2. Al-Anbari, E.H. 2020. Association of coat plumage colors (CPC) for Iraqi local chicken and some productive performance trait by using some analysis parameters. Ann Trop Med Public Heal, 23(06): 88-94. http://doi:10.36295/ASRO.2020.23612
3. Al-Ani, E. A., K. A. Al-Soudi and H. I. Al-Hiti. 1986. The location of local chickens in relation to some imported species and breeds. Journal of Agricultural Research. Water Resources. 5 (1): 223-235.
4. Al-Hassani D.H., W. M. Razuki and H. S. Abdulwahid. 2023. Variations and expression of very-low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) mRNA in the liver and ovary of a low egg production strain of local Iraqi hens. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 54(1): 114-123. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i1.1682
5. Al-Rawi, A.A. and A.K. Al-Athari. 2002. Characteristics of indigenous chicken in Iraq. Animal Genetic Resources Information. 32:87-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001589
6. Dana, N., E.H. Vander Waaij and J.A.M. Van Arendonk. 2011. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for body weights and egg production in Horro chicken of Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 43: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9649-4
7. Falconer, D. S. and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edition, Longmans Green, Harlow, Essex, UK. pp. 464.
8. Firozjah, N. G., H. Atashi. and A. Zare. 2015. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Mazandaran native chickens. Journal of Animal and Poultry Sciences, 4(2): 20-26.
9. Haunshi, S., M. K. Padhi, R. N. Chatterjee, T. K. Bhattacharya and K. S. Rajaravindra. 2016. Genetic characterization of layer germplasm evolved by AICRP on poultry breeding. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 86(2):1431-1435. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i12.65995
10. Haunshi, S., U. Rajkumar, L.L. Prince, K. Ramasamy, K. Gurunathan, S. Devatkal and R. N. Chatterjee. 2022. Genetic parameters of growth traits, trend of production and reproduction traits, and meat quality status of Ghagus, an indigenous chicken of India. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 54(3):170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03166-y
11. Hermiz, H. N. and M. S. Abdullah. 2020. Genetic and non-genetic parameters for body weight of two Iraqi local chickens. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 51(1), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i1.931
12. Jafarnejad, A., M. A. Kamali, S. J. Fatemi and M. Aminafshar. 2017. Genetic evaluation of laying traits in Iranian indigenous hens using univariate and bivariate animal models. Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 27 (1):20-27.
13. Kamali, M. A., S. H. Ghorbani, M.M. Zharbabak and M.J. Zamiri. 2007. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of economic traits in Iranian native fowl and estimated genetic trend and inbreeding coefficients, Bri. Poult. Sci. 48 (4): 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701505013
14. Manjula, P., H. Park, D. Seo, N. Choi, S. Jin, S. J. Ahn, K. N. Heo, B. S. Kang and J. H. Lee. 2018. Estimation of heritability and genetic correlation of body weight gain and growth curve parameters in Korean native chicken. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 31(1): 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0179
15. Meyer, K. 2007. WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University Science B. 8(11):815-821. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815
16. Mohammed, K.S. and Y.M. Al-Barzinji. 2022. Genetic characterization of body weight traits in rocky partridge chicks. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53(6): 1289-1297. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i6.1643
17. Mohmmed, S.A. and N.H. Hani. 2019. Genetic and non-genetic parameters for egg production traits of two Iraqi local chicks. Plant Archives, 19(2): 590-593.
18. Mokoena, K., V. Mbazima and T.L. Tyasi. 2025. A literature review on effect of chicken crossbreeding on egg production traits. World's Poultry Science Journal, 81(1) : 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2024.2443184
19. Mugnai, C., A.D. Bosco and C. Castellini. 2009. Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8: 175-188. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.175
20. Niknafs S., A. Nejati-Javaremi, H. Mehrabani-Yeganeh and S.A. Fatemi. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight and egg production traits in Mazandaran native chicken. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 44: 1437-1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0084-6
21. Nurgiartiningsih, V. M. A., N. Mielenz, R. Preisinger, M. Schmutz and L. Schüler. 2005. Heritabilities and genetic correlations for monthly egg production and egg weight of White leghorn hens estimated based on hen-housed and survivor production. Archive fur Geflügelkunde, 69 (3): S. 98-102.
22. Osei-Amponsah, R., B.B. Kayang and A. Naazie. 2013. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for production traits of local chickens in Ghana. Animal Genetic Resources, 53: 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633613000271
23. Rajkumar, U., K.S. Rajaravindra, S. Haunshi, M. Niranjan, T.K. Bahattacharya and R. N. Chatterjee. 2012. Genetic architecture of growth and production parameters in a laying cycle of 72 weeks in naked neck chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(6): 615-619.
24. Rajkumar, U., L. L. L. Prince, C. Paswan , S. Haunshi and R.N. Chatterjee. 2021.Variance component analysis of growth and production traits in Vanaraja male line chickens using animal model. Animal Bioscience.34(4):471-481. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0826
25. Rajkumar, U., M. K. Padhi, S. Haunshi and R. N. Chatterjee. 2016. Genetic and phenotypic response in Vanaraja male line chicken under short term selection experiment. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences,86:1287-1296. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i11.63320
26. Razuki, W. M. and S. A. Al-Shaheen. 2011. Use of full diallel crosses to estimate crossbreeding effects of laying chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10 (3):197-204. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.197.204
27. Razuki, W. M., A. S. H. Al-Machi, S. H. Farhan, S. A. Al-Bayati, A.Y. H. Al-Karagholi, F. D. Hameed, H A. Qasim, and A. H. Ali. 2022. On-station morphological features of Iraqi indigenous chickens. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Research, 26(1):221-236.
28. Reddy, B. L. N., R. N. Chatterjee, U. Rajkumar, M. Niranjan, K. S. Rajaravindra, and T. K. Bhattacharya. 2013. Genetic evaluation of short term selection in synthetic coloured broiler male and female lines-direct and correlated responses. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 83:285-9.
29. Salih, J.H. 2024. Genetic parameters of growth, carcass, and laying traits in two lines of Ukrainian quail. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55(6): 1984-1993. https://doi.org/10.36103/mh63qs86
30. Sang, B. D., H. S. Kong, H. K. Kim, C. H. Choi, S. D. Kim, Y. M. Cho, B. C. Sang, J. H. Lee, G. J. Jeon and H. K. Lee. 2006. Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Economic Traits in Korean Native Chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 19 (3): 319–323. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.319
31. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS User Guide for Personal Computer, Release 9.12. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC.
32. Shad, A. G., A. M. Zalani and J. Nasr. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters, inbreeding trend and its effects on production and reproduction traits of native fowls in Fars province. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.,16(12):598-600. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.598.600
33. Shad, A. G., A. N. Javaremi and H. M. Yeganeh. 2007. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters for most important economic traits in Iranian native fowls. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10 (16): 2787–2789. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.2787.2789
34. Shadparvar, A.A. and B. Enayati 2012. Genetic parameters for body weight and laying traits in Mazandaran native breeder hens. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2: 251-256.
35. Simeon R., P.D. Milun, B.B. Snežana and Š. Zdeuka. 2018. Effect of age and season on production performance and egg quality of laying hens from different rearing systems. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 28(6): 1602-1608.
36. Tongsiri, S., G. M. Jeyaruban, S. Hermesch, J. H. J. van der Werf, L. Li and T. Chormai. 2019. Genetic parameters and inbreeding effects for production traits of Thai native chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 32:930-938. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0690
37. Wolc, A., M. Lisoweski and T. Szwaczkowski. 2007. Heritability of egg production in layer hens under cumulative, multitrait and repeated measurements animal models. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52(8): 254-259. https://doi.org/10.17221/2282-CJAS
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
2.jpg)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5774-5906 2.jpg)
