MANAGEMENT OF AUTOMATIC AND CONVENTIONAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES IN GREENHOUSES, A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Hayder, H. Luaibi
  • Nawal, A. Omran
  • Firas Salim Al-Aani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/a36zk081

Keywords:

control, cucumber, monitoring, nozzle, pesticides, technology,

Abstract

This study aimed to used automated spraying inside greenhouses using automated sprayers and compare it with traditional spraying. An experiment was conducted in one of the greenhouses at the Research Center of the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad / Jadriyah, during the summer season on the cucumber crop cultivar CADIAR F1. The techniques used in the spraying process included a locally-made automated sprayer to spray pesticides inside the greenhouses horizontally and a knapsack sprayer. Two types of nozzles were used: universal flat fan nozzle (120-02C) and (120-04C), with three different pressures (1.8, 3, 5) bar, using a constant speed of 2 km h-1. This was to study the spray quality characteristics and the amount of waste resulting from using both methods. The experiment results indicated the automated sprayers’ success in achieving good spray quality with less waste compared to the backpack sprayer. The automated sprayer achieved good results in increasing the spray penetration rate into the foliage and reducing the waste rate of pesticides by (34.3%) and (2.42%) respectively, compared to the backpack sprayer, which achieved (14.46%) and (18.42%) respectively.

References

1. Abdul Ghafar, A. S. , M. Thariq, M. Bin Mail, and S. Salama. 2023. Design and development of a robot for spraying fertilizers and pesticides for agriculture. Materials Today Proceedings. 81:242-248. https://10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.174

2. Abraheem, S. N., and M. H. Alheidary. 2022. Evaluation of spray droplets characteristics depending on the configuration of boomless nozzle. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 1060(1-10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012128

3. Al-Aani, F. S., 2024. Technical and economical parameters influencing the performance and feasibility of Armatrac tractor to perform primary tillage and planting operation in silty clay loam soil. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55(3):1239-1250. https://doi.org/10.36103/ea480m26

4. Al-Aani, F. S. and O. H. Sadoon, 2023. Modern GPS diagnostic technique to determine and map soil hardpan for enhancing agricultural operation management. Journal of Aridland Agriculture, v.9, :58-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.25081/jaa.2023.v9.8511.

5. Alheidary, M., J. P. Douzals, A. Vallet, and C. Sinfort. 2020. An attempt to reduce spray drift in wind tunnel by substituting nozzles on the boom. CIGR J. 22(3):86-94.

6. Alwash, A. A. and F.S. Al-Aani, 2023. Performance evaluation of seed drill- fertilizer under two different farming systems and tractor practical speeds. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 54(4): 1155–1162. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i4.1809

7. Braekman, P., and B. Sonck. 2007. An appropriate technical inspection methodology to tackle the great diversity of spray equipment used in Flemish greenhouses. Aspects of Applied Biology. 83:95-98.

8. Burjus, SJ, I. S. Alsaadawi, and F. O. Janno. 2020. Effects of some cyanophyta along with the reduced levels of chemical fertilizers on the growth and yield of wheat. Iraqi J Sci. 61(11) 2849-2859. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2020.61.11.8

9. Fu, Q, X. Zhao, L. Zhang, and W. Chen. 2022. Improved greenhouse self-propelled precision spraying machine—Multiple height and level (MHL) control. Comput Electron Agric. 201:107265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107265

10. Ghafoor, A., M. Ali, R. Khan, and Z. Ahmed. 2022. Development and evaluation of a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer for agricultural sustainability in small farms. Sustainability. 14(15):9204. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14159204

11. Hejazipoor, H., M. Zhang, A. Lin, and R. Wang. 2021. An intelligent spraying robot based on plant bulk volume. Computers and Electronics in Agricuture. 180:105859.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105859

‏12. Jihad, G. H., M. A. Al-Sammarraie., and F. S. Al-Aani, 2024. Effect of cold plasma technique on the quality of stored fruits-A case study on Apples. Brazilian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering –AGRIAMBI 28, e276666. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v28n3e276666

13. Jones, K. M., S. A. Bound, and M. J. Oakford. 2000. Spray application technology. Plant Growth Regulation. 31(3):173-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006319120063

14. Liu, H., G. Chen, Y. Wang, and S. Zhang. 2023. Effects of nozzle types and spraying volume on the control of Hypera postica Gyllenhal by using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Agronomy. 13(9):2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092287

15. Liu, Y., C. Xu, L. Jiang, and Y. Li. 2020. Assessment of spray deposition and losses in an apple orchard with an unmanned agricultural aircraft system in China. Trans ASABE. 63(3):619-627.

16. Rincón, VJ, C. López, F. Buitrago, and P. Muñoz. 2017. Assessment of the influence of working pressure and application rate on pesticide spray application with a hand-held spray gun on greenhouse pepper crops. Crop Prot. 96:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.006

17. Shan, C, H. Zhu, W. Liang, and L. Zhou. 2021. Effects of droplet size and spray volume parameters on droplet deposition of wheat herbicide application by using UAV. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 14(1):74-81.

doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211401.6129.

18. Singh, M.C, M. Chand, A. Kumar, A. Singh, R. Yadav, N. Kaur, and J. Singh. 2017. Factors affecting the performance of greenhouse cucumber cultivation-a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 6(10):2304-2323. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.273

19. Sura, J. B, and I. H. H. Al-Hilfy. 2022. Effect of foliar application of moringa leaves extract on yield and quality of bread wheat. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 53(2):315-321. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i2.1538

20. Tekeste, M. Z., L. R. Balvanz, F.S. Al-Aani, A. Boesenberg, and J. L. Hatfield. 2022. Hardened edges effects on wear characteristics of cultivator sweeps using circular soil bin test. Journal of Tribology, 144(2), 024501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050805

21. Wang, S., W. Li, J. Zhang, T. Yang, and X. Li. 2016. Design of air-assisted electric knapsack sprayer and experiment of its operation performance. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 32(21):67-73.

http://dx.doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.21.009

22. Zhu, H., and S. M. Sciarini. 2011. Portable scanning system for spray deposit qualification. Deposit Scan Manual. 1(330):1-17.

23. Zhu, H., J. Qian, X. Zhang, and W. Li. 2002. Influence of plant structure, orifice size, and nozzle inclination on spray penetration into peanut canopy. Trans ASAE. 45(5):1295.

http://dx.doi.10.13031/2013.11058

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hayder, H. Luaibi, Nawal, A. Omran, & Firas Salim Al-Aani. (2025). MANAGEMENT OF AUTOMATIC AND CONVENTIONAL SPRAYING TECHNIQUES IN GREENHOUSES, A COMPARATIVE STUDY. IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 56(2), 869-877. https://doi.org/10.36103/a36zk081