ESTIMATION VARIABILITY AND SOME GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN PEA GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT PHOSPHOROUS LEVELS.

Authors

  • Samar A. Yako
  • Payman A. A. Zibari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/pnwyex20

Keywords:

genotypes, heritability, genetic advance, variation.

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate variability and some genetic parameters for yield and yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes under different phosphorous levels. A field experiment was carried out at the field of Horticulture Department, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Duhok University, on the 1st of November 2021. the experiment unites layout according to split-plot arrangement, the main plots include phosphorus levels (0, 18, 36, and 54 kg ha-1 P2O5 and the subplot represented the thirteen genotypes within RCBD. The results exhibited that phosphorus levels were highly significant for all traits except biological yield, also the genotypes show highly significant the with exception of harvest index, while the interaction between phosphorus levels and genotypes was highly significant for all studied traits except harvest index and pod length. The rate of 54 kg ha-1 P2O5 gave the highest value for the number of pods 281.359), length pod 3.94, 500 seed weight 86.54, biological yield 361.55, harvest index 10.82 and yield seed per plant 23.30. The local variety was superior in leaf area 808.08mm, length pod 10 cm, 500 seeds weight 25.369, also the genotype (1) gave the highest yield per plant 44.0367 kg ha-1 P2O5, for the interaction between genotypes and phosphorus levels of genotype (2).

References

1. Ali I, A. Rab and SA. Hussain 2002. Screening of pea germplasm for growth, yield and resistance against powdery mildew under the agro-climatic conditions of Peshawar (Pakistan). Sarhad J. Agri. 18(2): 177- 181. SJA 32 (3):455-460

2. Ali, A., Z Ali, J. Iqbal, M. A. Nadeam, N. Akhtar, H. M. Akram, and A. Sattar. 2010. Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus on seed yield of chick pea. Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(3): 25-28. Corpus ID: 97573391

3. Ali, M.A., A. Ali, M.I. Ahmad, S.W. Hassan, S.R. Khan and A.A. Abid. 2014. Phosphorus effects on growth and yield parameters of mungbean. Sci. Int., (Lahore). 26(4): 1821-1824.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.1999.667.669

4. Al-Kummer, M. K., S. Y. H. Al-Hamadany and A. A. H. Al Juboori, 2009. Genetic variability, expectant genetic advance and phenotypic correlation for yield and its components in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 37 (2): 105- https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2009.27415111

5. Anhar M., Alshummary, M. Lamiaa Alfreeh and H. M. Kareem 2021. Response of faba bean cultivars (Vicia faba L.) to phosphorus application. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. DocID: https:// connectjournals.com/03899.2021.17.329.

6. Barcchiya, J., A.K., Naidu, A.K. Mehta, and A. Upadhyay, 2018. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6:3324-3327. P-ISSN: 2349–8528 E-ISSN: 2321–4902 IJCS 2018; 6(2): 3324-3327 © 2018 IJCS

7. Beza S. W., A. Antneh, F. Tesfaye, W-M. Endalcachew and A. B. irhan 2020. Response of chick pea to sulphar and zinc nutrients applications and Rhizobium incoculation in north western Ethiopia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology Vo8, Iss10: 2040-2048.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i10.2040-2048.3414

8. Chala C., A. Habtamu and H. Ibrahim. 2020. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer levels on yield and yield components of chick pea varieties. Advance in Crop Science and Technology. 8(4): 2329-2337. ISSN: 2329-8863

9. Chaudhary, H., M.K. Verma, and A. A. Sofi, 2010. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield components in garden pea. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 8 (2): 195-197.DOI https://cabidigitallibrary.org 185.187.78.70, on 03/01/25

10. Gautam, K.K., M.M., Syamal, A.K Singh, and N. Gupta, 2017. Variability, character association and path coefficient analysis of green pod yield and its related traits in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research, 40:818-823. doi10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9104

11. Gudadinni, P., V., Bahadur, P., Ligade, S.E. Topno, and V.M. Prasad, 2017. study on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.) var. hortense Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci, 6(8): 2384- 2391. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.282

12. Haque SR, N. Akter MAH Khan, K. Kabir and MM. Islam 2015. Yield potential of garden pea varieties at varied harvesting dates. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 17(2): 21-28.Dio https://doi.org/10.3329/baj.v17i2.24648

13. Hashim. F. A and K. A. Hassan. 2023. Transformation of phosphorous in gypsiferous soils as affected by different fertilizers, land use and incubation periods. Iraqi Journal of agricultural sciences, 54(5): 1364-1373. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i5.1837

14. Jadav, K., and M. H. Sapovadiya, 2018. Combining ability for fruit yield and its component traits in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula (Roxb.) L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7(9), 62-66. ISSN (E): 2277- 7695 ISSN (P): 2349-8242 NAAS Rating: 5.03 TPI 2018; 7(9): 62-66

15. Kebede, G. Y., G. A., Haile, and T. Abo, 2021. genetic variability and associations of yield and yield related traits for fieldpea (Pisum stivum L.) Genotypes in Arsi Zone, Southeastern,Ethiopia. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 9(3), 50.

DOI https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210903.12

16. Kumar, D. 2014. Production potential of chick pea as influenced by graded levels of fertilizers and bio-fertilizers under South Gujarat condition. (Doctoral dissertation, Agronomy Dept. NM College of Agriculture, Navasari Agricultural University, Navasari) 396 450.

17. Kumar, Subodh and B.P. Singh, 2011 Response of pigeonpea genotypes to levels of phosphorus and sulphur. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 13 (1): 53-55.

DOI: 10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00132.7

18. Kumari, N., J.P Srivastava,., S.K., Singh, and I.P Singh,. 2012 Heritability and genetic advance in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum L.) Ann. Agric Res. New Series Vol. 33 (4): 244-246. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20210904.13

19. Nawab NN, GM, Subhani K, Mahmood Q. Shakil and A Saeed 2008. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies in garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agri. Res. 46(4): 333-340. ISSN (Print): 0368-1157ISSN (Electronic): 2076-7897CABI Record Number: 20093106340

20. atel, M.P., G.P., Richhariya, R.D Sharma, and K.N. Namdeo, 2012 Effect of fertility levels on nutrient contents and uptake of soybean genotypes. Crop Research 44 (1 and 2): 71- 74. Corpus ID: 101292101

21. Phom, C., Amet, S.P. Kanaujia, and H.P. Chaturvedi, 2014. Performance of various genotypes of pea under foothill condition of Nagaland. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 16 (4): 285-288. Doi https://www.gkvsociety.com/control/uploads/Performance%20of%20various%20genotypes%20of%20pea%20under%20foothill%20condition%20of%20Nagaland.pdf

22. Prajapati B. j., G. nitin, V. R. Gamit and H.J. Chhaganiya 2017. Effect of Integrated phosphorus management on growth, yield attributes and yield of chickpea. Agronomy Dept. NM College of Agriculture, Navasari Agricultural University, Navasari) india Fmg. And Mngmt. 2(1): 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2456-8724.2017.00006.6

23. Raj, P. , S. S. B. Kumar, K.N., Namdeo, Singh, Yogendra, S.S. Parihar, and M.K Ahirwar,. 2014 Effect of dual bio-inoculants on growth, yield, economics and uptake of nutrients in chickpea genotypes. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 16 (3) : 246-249. DOI: 10.5958/24568724.2017.00006.6

24. Rezgar. I. S and M. A. Hussain. 2024. heterosis and genetic parameters for yield and yield components in maize using half diallel cross. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55 (5): 1859-1869. https://doi.org/10.36103/6m976r30

25. Saket, Sukhlal, Singh, S

26. Sarwar, M., M.E. Akhtar, S.I. Hyder and M.Z. Khan. 2012. Effect of biostimulant (Humic Acid) on yield, phosphorus, potassium and boron use efficiency in peas. Persian Gulf Crop Prot., 1(4): 11-16. https://www.ablesci.com/scholar/paper?id=8AVARLYmr

27. Seid H., Fikrte Y. and T. Fetebu. 2015. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield component of chick pea at Kelemeda. South wollo, Ethiopia. 1(1): 29-35. http://www.eajournals.org/

28. Singh, A.,S. Singh, and JDP, Babu, . 2011. Heritability, character association and path analysis studies in early segregating population of field pea (Pisum sativum L. var. arvense). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, New York, pp. 401-430. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2011.86.92

29. Singh, S.P., Y. Kumar, and S. Singh, 2017 Effect of sources and levels of sulphur on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients in green gram (Vigna radiata). Annals of Plant and Soil Research 19(2): 143-147. https://gkvsociety.com/control/uploads/S.P.%20SINGH,%20YOGESH%20KUMAR%20AND%20SONU%20SINGH.pdf

30. Singh, Yogendra, Singh, Praveen, R.D., Sharma, G.S. Marko, and K.N. Namdeo, 2013. Effect of organic sources of nutrients on growth, yield and quality of lentil genotypes. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 15 (2): 134-137. https://gkvsociety.com/control/uploads/Effect-of-organic-sources-of-nutrients-on-growth-yield-and-quality-of-lentil-genotypes.pdf

31. Shad. R.H. Muhammad, S. N.H. Al.Hassoon and S. J.H. Dwenne 2024. A comparative study of organic and phosphate fertilizers with irrigation water quality on some soil properties and bean yield. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55 (5): 505-516. https://doi.org/10.36103/wyxa9p03

32. Siphiwe L., Jude O. and O. John. 2017. Growth, yield and water use efficiency of chickpea response to biochar and phosphorus fertilizer application. Agronomy and Soil Science. 22: 2-16. DOI:10.1080/03650340.2017.1407027

33. Yadav, P., AK Singh, and CP, Srivastava, .2010. genetic variability and character association in diverse collection of Indian and exotic germplasm lines of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Veg. Sci. 37(1): 75-77. https://isvsvegsci.in/index.php/vegetable/article/download/733/555

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

Issue

Vol. 56 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Samar A. Yako, & Payman A. A. Zibari. (2025). ESTIMATION VARIABILITY AND SOME GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN PEA GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT PHOSPHOROUS LEVELS. IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 56(2), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.36103/pnwyex20