ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE EFFICIENCY ON POTATO FARMS AT BAGHDAD GOVERNORATE

Authors

  • A. H. Alzubaidi
  • E. H. Ali Ratha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/0tw7hf77

Keywords:

Value of sustainability, sustainability of capital, potato farms, volatile nitrogen.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the sustainable efficiency and calculate the sustainable value, opportunity cost and revenue to cost of potato production farms in Baghdad Governorate. Data were collected from a random sample of 102 spring potato producers in Baghdad governorate for the year 2022, the value-added function was estimated using three levels: economic (seeds and space), and social (education level), while environmental represented by (residual and volatile of nitrogen). Effective resources were calculated to extract the sustainability value- SV appeared on an average of 18023.15 thousand Iraqi dinars. Positive relationship with residual nitrogen and productivity, and Inverse relationship to the amount of volatile nitrogen. Whereas the average sustainable efficiency was 0.59% and has a positive relationship with productivity. The highest level of sustainable efficiency was achieved with the highest productivity of 7.4 tons/ donum, as well as residual nitrogen, where at its maximum quantity, the sustainable efficiency reached a maximum of 1.54%, although it was an inverse relationship to volatile nitrogen. The research found that, on average, the opportunity cost was 3.7 and the cost-benefit ratio was 1.09. The study concluded that as farming areas expand, the sustainable efficiency of farmers increases. It also recommended the optimal use of resources and expansion of areas to take advantage of mass production benefits. Additionally, the research emphasized the importance of using resources sustainably to avoid negative environmental impacts. This includes committing to specific dates and quantities when adding fertilizers and pesticides, as their impact on the environment is direct. Furthermore, the research highlighted the importance of participating in training courses to improve scientific knowledge and production performance.

References

1. Ali, Z. G., M. A Mahmood, A. T. Al-Baldawi, A. T. and E. H. Ali, 2024. Evaluate Efficiency of Management in Using Some Seed Varieties for Wheat Production in Diyala Governorate, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,1371(10)):1-10. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/10/102010

2.Ali, E. H. Bulqader, M. A. and Y. T. Baker, 2024. An Economic Study of Crop Structure in Salah Al-Din Province Using Linear Programming. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1371 102024. 1-17. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/10/102024

3. Ali, E. H, A. A. Awf and A. S .Shukr .2024. Estimating off –farm labor supply and analysing relationship between risk and farm size Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 55(1):526-541. https://doi.org/10.36103/afwgrz97 .

4.Ali. E. H , D. A. Abu and M. KH. Mohammed. 2023. A study of economic, social, and institutional factors affecting the adoption of the high-rank wheat seeds. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 54(1) :161-175. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i1.1688 .

5.Ali. E .H, A. Alsaad and S. A . Sura . 2020. An economic analysis of factors affecting farmer's decision on using chemical fertilizers International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical 16(1):281-288 .

6. Borza, M. 2014. The connection between efficiency and sustainability - a theoretical approach. Romania Journal of Procedia economics and finance 15(11):1355-1363.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS2212-5671(14)00599-1 .

7.Cornejo, B, J. Méndez, D. Roibás, and A.Wall,. 2020. Efficiency and sustainability in farm diversification initiatives in northern Spain. Spain Journal of Sustainability 12(10):1-18.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12103983 .

8.Dillon, E. J, T. Hennessy, C. Buckley, T. Donnellan, K. Hanrahan, B. Moran, and M. Ryan. 2014. the sustainable intensification of the irish dairy sector. France: Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society AgroParisTech.17P 11(9):1-17 https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.169740 .

9. Dyer, C. L. and J. J. Poggie. 2000. The Natural Resource Region and marine policy: A case study from the New England groundfish fishery. Marine Policy 24(3): 245–255.

10. Esty D.C, M.A Levy, T. Srebotnjak, and A. Sherbinin .2005. Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Yale Centre for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 8 (33):1-18

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2015-0206 .

11. Fakkhong, S., S. Suneeporn. and P. Mankeb. 2018. Determinants of sustainable efficiency of rice farming in the periurban area, evidence from Ladkrabang district, Bangkok, Thailand. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sust. Development. 14(3): 393-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2018.091729 .

12.Figge, F.,T, Hahn. 2005. The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies. J. Ind. Ecol. 9(4):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247936 .

13.Fraser, E. D. G, A. J Dougill, W. E Mabee, M. Reed and P. McAlpine, . 2006. Bottom-up and top-down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. France: Journal of Environmental Management 78(2):114-27.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009

14.Güney, O. İ. 2021. Eco-Efficiency in Farm Management for Sustainable Agriculture: a Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis in Wheat Production. Turkey: Çukurova University 30(6):5549-5557

http://dx.doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/136474 .

15.Gomes, E. G , J. C de Mello, G.D Souza, L.A. Meza, and J.A. Mangabeira .2009. Efficiency and sustainability assessment for a group of farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. Brazil 169(1):167-181.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0390-6 .

16.Halkos, G, N. Tzeremes, and S. Kourtzidis. 2015. Measuring sustainability efficiency using a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Greece Journal of Industrial Ecology 20(5):1159-1175

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12335 .

17.Hayati, D., E. Karami, and Z. Ranjbar . 2010. Measuring Agricultural Sustainabiliy. Iran.p:73-100 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9513-8_2 .

18. Feaq, M. F., and E. H. ALI .2019. Using probability regression models to measuring management efficiency for broiler projects, Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences 50(SpecialIssue):76-83, https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v50iSpecial.179

19. Hou, L , D. Hoag, C. M. Keske, and C. Lu. 2014. 'Sustainable value of degraded soils in China's Loess Plateau: an updated approach', Journal of Ecological Economics 97: 20–27.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.013 .

20.Kaleel, D. M. and E. H Ali. 2024. Economic feasibility study for the project of barley production with hydroponic method, Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55 (SpecialIssue):233-245 https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v55iSpecial.1902

21.Khafaji, A. M. H. H., K. D. H. Al-jubouri, F. Y. Baktash, I. J. Abdul Rasool, and Z. J. Al-Mousawi. 2024. Amelioration potato plant performance under drought conditions in Iraq by using titanium dioxide, and biodegrading, biodegradable treatments. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 55(6) : 1885-1893. https://doi.org/10.36103/03fway21

22. Mahdiloo, M., R. F.Saen, and K. H . Lee, 2015. Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 168: 279–289.

23. Ehrmann, M. 2008. Comparing Sustainable Value Approach, Data Envelopment Analysis and Indicator Approach - An Application On German Dairy Farms. 12th Congress Of The European Association of Agricultural Economists pp:1-12.

24.Mohammadi, A., G. Venkatesh, S. Eskandari and S. Rafiee. 2022. Eco-Efficiency analysis to improve environmental performance of wheat production. Iran: Agriculture. 12(7):1031.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071031

25.Okab, S. I., and Z. A . Abed .2023. Gene expression of a nitrogen tolerance gene ZmNR1 under the influence of different levels of nitrogen in maize. Bionatura 8(1),1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.01.93.

26.Omrani, H., M. Shams and A. Emrouznejad, 2021. Evaluating sustainable efficiency of decision‐making units considering undesirable outputs: an application to the airline using integrated multi‐objective DEA‐TOPSIS. Iran. 25: 5899–5930 .

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

A. H. Alzubaidi, & Ratha, E. H. A. (2025). ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE EFFICIENCY ON POTATO FARMS AT BAGHDAD GOVERNORATE. IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 56(Special), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.36103/0tw7hf77

Similar Articles

11-20 of 203

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.