EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON WHEAT PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY USING A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS

Authors

  • E. H. Ali
  • Y. T. Baker
  • B. F. Al-Douri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i2.1542

Keywords:

transcendent production function, sprinklers' productivity, water use efficiency. Possession of a farm.

Abstract

This study was aimed to director wheat production's technical efficiency grown under two irrigation systems(fixed and pivot sprinkler irrigation systems)using random border analysis.Samples were collected randomly from267farmers from Salah Al-Din Governorate/Iraq.The samples were divided into two groups;187farmers used a pivot sprinkler irrigation system with three categories of possession(80,60and120dunums),while the other group used a fixed sprinkler irrigation system with four categories of possession(40,30,20and10dunums).Transcendent production function was used to study the effect of production factors on wheat yield. The results indicated that the mechanization work and the amount of added irrigation water increased by 1% while the wheat yield increased by0.08and0.15%,respectively.The pivot sprinkler irrigation system's technical efficiency averaged0.86,while the fixed sprinkler irrigation system's efficiency was0.84.The technical efficiency and experience increased with the farmers' experience with supplementary irrigation, the cultivated area and age. On the other hand, technical efficiency and experience decreased with the family's size and wheat cultivating experience. Furthermore, farmers who owned mechanization were more efficient than the lessors. The sprinklers' highest productivity was in the pivot sprinkler irrigation system at120dunums and was 108,930 kg. The highest productivity per water unit was0.86in the fixed sprinkler irrigation system of10 and 40 dunums. The efficiency of water use was 86% when the cultivated area was120dunums with the pivot sprinkler irrigation system and87% at40 dunums with the fixed sprinkler irrigation system.

References

Ahmed, M. and K.Q. Safraz.1998. Recent evidence on farm size and land productivity : Implications for Public Policy . The Pakistan Development Review. 4(38):1135-1153

Al Ezzy, J. M. 2000. Minimum requirements for land to achieve a certain level of income. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (31):97-104

Al-Adhari, A. H. 1996. The Role of Development Programs in Increasing Cereal Production in Iraq. Abu Ghraib, Baghdad: Iba Centre for Agricultural Research.pp:5

Albajary, U. T. 2001. Estimating the Impact of Technology on Agricultural Production in Iraq for the Period (1970-1993). (Unpublished) M.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Mosul. pp:4

Ali, E. H. and J.M. Al-Azi.2015. Estimating farm technical efficiency by using stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 46(2): 226-268

Ali, E.H. 2020. Farm labour homogeneity alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production in Diyala province as a case study. Plant 20(1):1707-1714

Al-Niamy, S. Y.and K. Shideed 2010. Omparative Economic Analysis Of Effect Of Supplemental Irrigation In Wheat Rowth In Dry Areas. Mu'tah Journal for Agricultural Research. Jordan.pp:3

Amaechina, E. C. and E.C. Eboh .2017. Resource use efficiency in rice production in the lower Anambra irrigation project, Nigeria, Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics.9(8): 234-242

Coelli, T. J. 1995. Estimators and hypothesis test for a stochastic frontier function : A monte carlo analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis,23( 6):247–268

Coelli. T. 1996. A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program" CEPA . Working Paper.pp: 96/08

Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and International Center for Agricultural Research in The Dry Areas (ICARDA). 2003. Enhancing Agricultural Productivity Through On-From Water-Use Efficiency: An Empirical Case Study of Wheat Production in Iraq. United Nations, New York.pp:231

Gonzalez . M. M. and L. Trujillo . 2009. Efficiency measurement in the port industry: a survey of the empirical evidence, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy.7(8):1-35

Hall, B. F.and E.P. Leven, 1978.. Farm size and economic efficiency: The case of California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.60(4): 589-600

Herrero, I.and P. Sean, 2002. Estimation of technical efficiency: A review of some of the stochastic frontier and DEA software. economics network, 15(1):1-11

Koutsoyiannic , A. 1977. Theory of Econometrics: An Introductory Exposition of Econometric Methods .2ed. Mc. Millan.pp:699.

Rijib,M.Z. and O.K.Jabara.2016.Measuring the technical efficiency and the rate of change in the TFP for farms rain-fed wheat in the region in light of differing . The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 47(6):1475-1485.

Newell , A , P. Thomas and Y. K. Symons 1997. Farm size and the Intensity of land use in Gujarat. Oxford Economic papers. 49(2):307-315

Owais, D. 2003. Supplementary Irrigation, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Retrieved from http://www.icarda.cgiar.org/Arabic/publications/supplemental-Irrigation/supplemental-Irrigation-contents.htm .p.7.

Radam, A. M.and A.M. Abduli 2008. Technical efficiency of small and medium enterprise Malaysia: A Stochastic Frontier Production Model. Int. Journal of Economics and Management, 2(2), 395-408.

Thomas, M. .2007. Productivity, Technical Efficiency and farm size In Paraguayan Agriculture `Working Paper No. 490 P: 1-37

Zhuo, C.,W. Huffman and R. Scott, 2009. Farm technology and technical efficiency: evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review.20(2): 153-161.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ali, E. H., Baker, Y. T. ., & Al-Douri, B. F. . (2022). EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON WHEAT PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY USING A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS. IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 53(2), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v53i2.1542

Similar Articles

11-20 of 708

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.